According to @OnchainDataNerd, a single whale withdrew 25M ENA (~$6.83M) from Bybit and 21.779M ENA (~$5.95M) from another wallet over the last ~2 hours (source: @OnchainDataNerd). The same address now holds roughly 492M ENA (about $121M), with the address link provided in the post: https://t.co/TjLIO12nCr (source: @OnchainDataNerd). This indicates a 25M ENA net outflow from Bybit to the whale’s custody during the cited window (source: @OnchainDataNerd). Based on these reported on-chain flows, traders can monitor ENA liquidity and order books on Bybit and track subsequent transfers from the highlighted address for potential market impact (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, whale address 0xFB3BF33Ba8E5d08D87B0db0e46952144DF822833 withdrew 24M $ASTER worth $41.79M from Gate, while newly created wallet 0x5bd424475463bE257fBb58ad407C0F39da4A9142 withdrew 3.46M $ASTER worth $6.78M from Bybit on Sep 24, 2025 (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). This totals 27.46M $ASTER valued at $48.57M moving off these exchanges to self-custody, representing a net outflow that reduces immediately available exchange inventory on Gate and Bybit for the period observed (source: @OnchainLens, Nansen). For trading context, Glassnode has documented that sustained net exchange outflows commonly align with accumulation behavior and reduced near-term sell-side liquidity, a dynamic traders often monitor during whale activity (source: Glassnode, The Week On-Chain research). Kaiko has also reported that subsequent whale redeposits can precede elevated short-term volatility, underscoring the need to track any return flows to exchanges (source: Kaiko Research).